Evaluation of plan quality in radiotherapy planning with an MR-linac.

Abstract

MATERIALS & METHODS

Data of eight rectal and eight prostate cancer patients, who received radiotherapy on a conventional CBCT-integrated linac, were selected. Clinically acquired CTs and associated delineations of target volumes and organs-at-risk (OARs) were used for MR-linac treatment planning in Monaco. To investigate treatment planning software bias 'quasi MR-linac plans' were generated in Pinnacle³ by mimicking MR-linac specific beam characteristics. MR-linac, quasi MR-linac, and clinical plans were compared and differences in target and OAR doses assessed. Differences in plan complexity were determined by the number of segments and monitor units.

RESULTS

Compared to clinical plans, MR-linac plans showed a statistically significant decrease in plan homogeneity, an increase in PTV D_mean (prostate: 0.6 Gy; rectum: 0.8 Gy) and D_1% (prostate: 1.9 Gy; rectum: 2.0 Gy), and increases in OAR dose. Quasi MR-linac plans were comparable to MR-linac plans with respect to OAR dose and plan homogeneity. For rectal cancer an increase was seen in PTV D_mean (0.12 Gy) and D_1% (0.5 Gy) compared to regular MR-linac plans. All created plans were clinically equivalent to current clinical practice.

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE

Clinical introduction of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy involves treatment planning while taking into account machine-specific characteristics. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility of high-quality MR-linac treatment planning for an MR-linac and to benchmark MR-linac plan quality (IMRT) against current clinical practice (VMAT).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the feasibility of creating high-quality MR-linac treatment plans. The results supported the clinical introduction of an MR-linac.