Validation of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging techniques in head and neck healthy structures involved in the salivary and swallowing function: Accuracy and repeatability.

Abstract

RESULTS

Bias was 0.009x10^-3 mm²/s for ADC, -0.7 % for FF and -7.9 ms for T₂. RCs ranged 0.11-0.25x10^-3 mm²/s for ADC, 1.2-6.3 % for FF and 2.5-6.3 ms for T₂. A significant positive linear relationship between age and the FF and T₂ for some of the OARs was found.

CONCLUSION

These qMRI techniques are feasible, accurate and repeatable, which is promising for treatment response monitoring and/or differentiating between healthy and unhealthy tissues due to radiation-induced damage in HNC patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiation-induced damage to the organs at risk (OARs) in head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patient can result in long-term complications. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), DIXON for fat fraction (FF) estimation and T₂ mapping could potentially provide a spatial assessment of such damage. The goal of this study is to validate these qMRI techniques in terms of accuracy in phantoms and repeatability in-vivo across a broad selection of healthy OARs in the HN region.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Scanning was performed at a 3 T diagnostic MRI scanner, including the calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from DWI, FF and T₂ maps. Phantoms were scanned to estimate the qMRI techniques bias using Bland-Altman statistics. Twenty-six healthy subjects were scanned twice in a test-retest study to determine repeatability. Repeatability coefficients (RC) were calculated for the parotid, submandibular, sublingual and tubarial salivary glands, oral cavity, pharyngeal constrictor muscle and brainstem. Additionally, a linear mixed-effect model analysis was used to evaluate the effect of subject-specific characteristics on the qMRI values.